What did Bonhoeffer See?

October 20, 2011Ric Hudgens

Post image for What did Bonhoeffer See?

In January, 1935 Dietrich Bonhoeffer wrote to his brother Karl-Friedrick “The restoration of the church will surely come only from a new type of monasticism which has nothing in common with the old but a complete lack of compromise in a life lived in accordance with the Sermon on the Mount in the discipleship of Christ.  I think it is time to gather people together to do this…”

This letter was written less than a year after the Barmen Declaration and four months after Adolf Hitler had assumed complete dictatorial control of the German state.  It came four years before the beginning of the most devastating war in human history resulting in the deaths of 50-70 million people.

In light of that context Bonhoeffer’s proposal to begin forming a “new type of monasticism” seems like a counsel of despair, withdrawal, and perhaps even irresponsibility.  It has been argued that Bonhoeffer later repented of this project and joined the assassination plot against Hitler as a better alternative.  I do not want to argue that here.  What I do want to investigate is what might have led someone as insightful, brave, and devout as Dietrich Bonhoeffer to turn towards the Sermon on the Mount and the practice of communal discipleship as the appropriate initiative for engaged Christians in a time of global crisis.  What did Bonhoeffer see in Jesus’ sermon for such a time as that?  What might we still see for such a time as ours?

Bonhoeffer saw in the Sermon on the Mount the resources for responding to the German crisis in at least three ways.  First, he saw that the Sermon contained the resources for resistance to National Socialism, German patriotism, and the war.  Resistance would be practiced not just in subversive anti-government actions, but also in the formation of a church that could not be seduced by the false promises of blood and soil.  Crucial to the practice of cultural resistance was the formation of a Christian people, a confessing church, trained in and practicing the Sermon on the Mount without compromise.

Second, Bonhoeffer saw that the Sermon and the founding of a “new type of monasticism” would lay the foundations for a new social order after the war was over.  It did not matter whether Germany won this war or not (and it was clear through Bonhoeffer’s efforts that he hoped for Germany’s defeat); what mattered was establishing centers for renewal where a new type of recovery could begin and a new type of society be established.  These were in reality communities of and for the future, not communities trying to preserve or recreate an idyllic past.

Finally, Bonhoeffer saw that the Sermon on the Mount was the key resource for the restoration and renewal of the church and the church’s capacity to recover her voice as God’s people.  The Barmen Declaration had unmasked the false religion of the established church for the idolatry that it was.  A renewed church where Christians were catechized in the Sermon on the Mount would not look like the mainline churches that had been so susceptible to the appeal of National Socialism.   It would be a church founded upon and shaped by Christ alone.

Utilizing Bonhoeffer’s example what might we see in our own time of global crisis?  I want to briefly suggest ten things that summarize the Sermon in language that is suggestive for our contemporary situation as radical disciples of Jesus.  These may not relate well to you at all, but they have related well to others with whom I have shared them; and they reflect my own continuing attempts to understand the revolutionary potential that the Sermon contains for “a life lived . .  . in the discipleship of Christ.”

  1. This life is for those who hunger for justice and peacemaking (5:6,9)

Bonhoeffer certainly did not see the Sermon as an alternative to justice-seeking and conflict transformation.  Although addressed to disciples only, it was not for disciples only.  On the contrary, it was by means of a disciplined spiritual formation that a broader justice and peace would be furthered.

  1. This life is an oppositional, countercultural way of life (5:10-11)

However, the way of peace is not a peaceful way.  Clearly, this community will not seek to always stay out of trouble, keep its beliefs to itself, living quietly in the land.  It is important that opposition come for the right reasons (“for the sake of justice”), but the absence of outer conflict is not a sign of inner faithfulness – and may in fact indicate just the opposite!

  1. This life leads us into public ministry and the social performance of the gospel (5:14-16)

The Sermon on the Mount forms a public church.  This church does not reside in the public square, nor do public concerns control its agenda.  But it does not confine its witness to the byways or out-of-ways, but brings it’s message out to front street where everyone can see and evaluate it.

  1. This life is a creative, improvisatory style of life (5:21-48)

Jesus contradicts the Mosaic law not to impose an alternative law, but to propose the practice of grace.  A life lived by the practice of grace is going to have an unpredictable, nonconforming aspect to it.  Many of the central concerns of human society (the rule of law, the sanctity of life, sexual relations, contracts, conflict) are reevaluated and transformed by the way of Christ.  It is not a blueprint, but a trajectory – a way, a practice, a discipline.

  1. This life draws upon a hidden religiosity, a deep spirit (6:1-18)

Just at the time when the outer crises increase our confusion and fear we are called to go deeper, be quieter, and to seek out the hidden way of a spiritual discipline of sharing, fasting, and prayer.

  1. This life is sometimes iconoclastic and polarizing (6:19-24)

Perhaps the icons of our day are no longer the statues and relics in our places of worship, but the “mammon” that seeks our ultimate allegiance in place of God.  The Sermon does not allow for a posture of toleration towards that which would redirect the way of Christ.

  1. This life requires boldness, courage, and radical trust (6:25-34)

Fear is the enemy of faith and rather than selling fear we should be nurturing faith; doubting our doubts and entrusting ourselves to the God who can still surprise us with the specificity of God’s care.

  1. This life demands on-going transformation and growth (7:1-6)

And then with enemies all around we are reminded that it’s not about them it’s about us.  We are the ones called to change.  We are the ones called to repentance.  We are the ones God keeps waiting for.

  1. This life is an adventurous but challenging way (7:7-20)

It will not be boring! You will be called to do things in new ways, never certain of the means, yet never doubting your provision.  There will be dangers, mistakes, wrong turns, deceptions, and disappointments along the way.  But in the end your faithfulness will “bear fruit”.

  1. This life is for the long haul and is sustainable and enduring (7:24-27)

This is the most important passage in the entire Sermon.  Jesus is not forming a people around a single issue or a common cause or a movement. This is “full catastrophe” living, which can survive any and all crises.  No one would embark upon such a journey without a promise like this.  We work not for ourselves or even for our children, but for our great grand children.  God’s dream is the work of generations.

Perhaps, the Sermon on the Mount and the formation of discipleship communities seeking to live out that Sermon without compromise is still the place for us to begin addressing all the crises that stimulate our addictions, capture our fears, and inflame our anxieties.  Perhaps it continues to be the time to “gather the people together to do this.”

  • Dale Ziemer

    Thanks, Ric, for naming it… “Crucial to the practice of cultural resistance was the formation of a Christian people, a confessing church, trained in and practicing the Sermon on the Mount without compromise.”

  • Eda Uca Dorn

    Thank you so much for sharing this. What a gem!

  • Kelvin Reynolds

    I assume the numbers after each point are bible references? what book?

    • ric hudgens

      Sorry about that. The Sermon on the Mount is found in the Gospel according to Matthew, chapters 5, 6, and 7.

  • http://twitter.com/thejoeturner Joe Turner

    hmm, that is an interesting thought – the plot certainly seems to be out of character in the context of Bonhoeffer’s life as far as my limited reading suggests. On the other hand, I can’t see much evidence in his prison diaries that he protested ignorance of the plot – but maybe I need to go back and read them again.

    It is an interesting mental exercise to contemplate whether it matters – even if Bonhoeffer had nothing to do with the plot, would he or could he have been involved?

    Thanks again for challenging my assumption and prejudice.

  • ric hudgens

    Thx Andy. I did not know about this.

  • http://humandiscourse.wordpress.com/ Gideon Frambert

    Great article! Thank you for this! I think it is important for those seeking to live the Sermon on the Mount, the life of discipleship, to have a historic foundation upon which to build. Perhaps this be part of that narrative. I am curious about your perspective on institutional church. Have you ever read “Pagan Christianity?”

    • ric hudgens

      Hi Gideon. The good thing about Frank Viola and George Barna’s book Pagan Christianity is that it will assist evangelicals who are embedded in contemporary church structures to think more critically and creatively (and faithfully) about how to do discipleship.

      The one concern I have is that the “ecclesiastical primitivism” (my term) that Viola and Barna seem to commend is helpful in describing things, but not so helpful in prescribing them. In other words, they give us some stimulating questions for examining what’s essential and inessential about churches today. What they can’t really do and shouldn’t really do (and shouldn’t lead other people to think they can do) is layout a blueprint for how “the church” needs to be ordered in every context today. [And I could also argue that such a one size fits all mentality is also a cultural artifact more rooted in contemporary paganism than it is in faith - but I won't do that now.]

      We (all followers of Jesus) will always be a unwieldy assortment of “christianities” in a variety of different ecclesial formations and stages of maturity. To think there is one best way that once was lost but now is found is a delusion. The early churches were born in pluralistic cultural environments as people “coming out from among them” and they carried the cultures of their socialization with them as they formed their separated (and only later conjoined) Christian communities. Trying to isolate the DNA of “the church” is a like trying to isolate the DNA of the Adam and Eve.

      On the other hand, some ways are better than others and to the degree that Viola and Barna contribute to our thinking about that I want to commend them. The Sermon on Mount is Jesus’s plan and it is always a good place to start again, no matter what type of ecclesiastical body you are a part of or not a part of. [Plus, it's right there in the New Testament so you don't have send $18 to support Barna's publishing company . . . ]

      I do think there are some core elements to following Jesus, but I do not want my Christian faith to be reduced to those elements alone and exclude all the richness and diversity (as well as confusion and challenge) that the cultural expressions of that core bring to us and the world. I am convinced that when we become like Christ we do not become more like each other, but in fact develop more individuality and diversity in a Christlike formation. That would be just as true for “churches” as for individuals.

      But it would be interesting to hold Bonhoeffer’s commendation of a “new kind of monasticism” based on the Sermon on the Mount (which actually leaves a lot of openness to a variety of corporate arrangements) up next to Viola and Barna and see what each looks like. I’m sure that Viola and Barna can accommodate the Sermon, but for me I questions whether that is the only way that it can be accommodated.

      • primaltruth

        “The good thing about Frank Viola and George Barna’s book Pagan Christianity is that it will assist evangelicals who are embedded in contemporary church structures to think more critically … how to do discipleship. The one concern I have is that the “ecclesiastical primitivism” (my term) that Viola and Barna seem to commend is helpful in describing things, but not in prescribing them. In other words, they give us some stimulating questions for examining what’s essential and inessential about churches today. What they can’t really do is layout a blueprint for how “the church” needs to be ordered in every context today. We (all followers of Jesus) will always be a unwieldy assortment of “christianities” in a variety of different ecclesial formations and stages of maturity.”

        For me this brings into focus what is it that is essential to Christianity. There is indeed great variety to the practice of Christianity, with its various institutions. Such institutions with all that they developed would not be such essentials. I would say for real Christians, however they congregate, what is essential is they will follow the things Jesus said, obediently, and not intionally or recklessly go against what was commanded in what he said. We all have failed somewhere, but we should come to know such things seeking to live better. Learning more in this as we should ought to lead us to living better, on an increasingly greater scale. Churches have not always led well in this, but this happening would be essential to living and practicing Christianity. There would be some things going better in the world for it.

  • http://literating.wordpress.com/ Lancelot

    Great list. I’ll be filing this one away.

  • jon felton

    Thanks for this.

  • Andrew

    Hi Ric,
    I was wondering if you could tell me the book you got the quote from? I’d like to read more.

    • ric hudgens

      A Testament to Freedom: the Essential Writings of Dietrich Bonhoeffer, by Dietrich Bonhoeffer, edited and transl by Geffrey B. Kelly and F. Burton Nelson (HarperCollins, 1995), page 424

      • Andrew

        Thank you!

Previous post:

Next post: