patriotism is slavery

September 30, 2011John D. Rich, Jr.

Post image for patriotism is slavery

In Leo Tolstoy’s essay, “On Patriotism,” Tolstoy describes patriotism as the unnatural regard for one’s country, over and above every other country. Unnatural, because it must be stoked by governments through events, commemorations, and rituals. The latest “anniversary” of 9/11 has unsettled me, as most historical-political rallies do, because beneath the surface of the national requirement to remember this event is the subtext of war, and the unspoken assumption that we should be willing to sacrifice for any war fought in the memory of those who were killed.

In a news story by ABC on September 11, President Obama spoke of the men and women who have chosen to sign up for military service in the last decade, saying that too many of them “will never come home” from tours abroad. The article went on to talk about the ever-present danger of a terrorist attack, and our need to be alert. In other stories by CNN and CBS, September 11 was described as a reminder that there are nations who wish to destroy freedom, but that God was on the side of those who carry on the message of liberty.

This sounds like the Crusades! God is marching before us, ready to help us kill any who would get in our way.

In his essay, Tolstoy speaks at length about “the influence of..government over the people used to excite their animosity against other people.” He makes the bold claim that “in all history there is no war which was not hatched by the governments.” In order to keep the ranks of cannon fodder full, solemn speeches are given about the danger of invasion or terror from other lands, and the need for the people to obey their government in order that the superiority of [fill in the name of your country here] may be demonstrated. There is an orchestrated attempt by the rulers of governments to create emotional agreement with the prospect of “dying for your country.”

As John Legend sings in Our Generation:

Our leaders make us fight.
We don’t know what for.
If they want people killed,
Let them fight the war.
It’s gotta end somewhere,
This killin’s got to cease.
If no one were to fight,
We’d all live in peace.

To sign up for the military, one must relinquish all personal power to the military leaders, and sign an oath to obey any military order, without any need to know what those orders might be. When patriotic fervor can be maintained at a high level (e.g. the ridiculous shouting of USA!USA!USA! at 9/11 events), the argument that military might is the only way to maintain peace (!) allows the rulers to satisfy their ambitions, all under the blessing of those who benefit from the continuation of the present state of the State.

I am particularly disturbed by the Church’s role in supporting the violence of the state, as I’ve written in my recent article, the church is the whore of the state. It is clear that Jesus and the early church were anti-establishment, anti-authority troublemakers, who would never agree to bless the state-sanctioned mass murder that we call war. We are to disregard the violence and arrogance of the state as Jesus did before Pilate, whose silence before his questions is an act of utter disgust and defiance for Rome and its punishments. The absolute incompatibility between authentic Christianity and war (which is justified through unquestioned patriotism) is not limited to Christians, however. Every religion has some form of the aphorism, “Do to others as you would have them do to you.” Surely, this includes murder. Yet, we make exceptions for military action. Let’s just be honest: Killing by people in the military is still murder.

Patriotism is a lie, and its potential for evil is continually stoked by governments in order to justify a never-ending cycle of war. Until we reject the unspiritual notion that any country is better than any other, and until we inspire a generation of people who will refuse to murder under orders from violent institutions (e.g. the state and the church), we will continue to kill each other without recognizing that we are all murderers in the eyes of the Gods of every religion.

Let us lift off the yokes which bind us. There are no countries! No group of people is superior to any other. All governments are complicit in violence and the threat of violence in order to keep us from realizing how truly duped we are.

This essay is a call for all people of faith to recognize the incompatibility between following religious teachings and participation in any event or ritual with a subtext of war. Refuse the Pledge of Allegiance. Refuse the Star-Spangled Banner. Refuse the countless parades and holidays which bind us to our narrative of military superiority. Refuse to believe that war is ever the only way to resolve conflict. Refuse to support in any way the strong arm of the rulers, including statements about “supporting the troops.” Patriotism is slavery. The military is packed with murderers. Speak out against this evil wherever you can, with all your might.

  • ric hudgens

    John, If we define patriotism as Tolstoy did (“unnatural regard”) is there a place for a “natural” regard for one’s country? If not, what loyalties do we have to those with whom we share common borders, common history, common law, etc? Are terms like “patriotism” and “citizen” entirely beyond redemption? If so, then how do we find common ground with our neighbors who share our aversion to empire, violence, and the “unnatural regard” of patriotism? Is there a difference between love of country and love of nation?

  • Zach

    It seems to me that you are on the right track by framing the argument in terms of competing narratives, but I find your last paragraph problematic. You frame your argument (and indeed, your purpose) in destructive language. We are to refuse things that seem inseparable from our society. I don’t disagree with this, but rather than saying “don’t do this,” I think it would be more helpful and less militant to say “do this instead.” Outline the opposing narrative Christianity presents, but do so without pretense.

    You claim that the military is full of murderers. This is, I do no doubt, “backed up” by your claim that “Killing by people in the military is still murder.” However, you provide absolutely no basis for this claim. How am I to find myself agreeing with you if you do not argue for it? Furthermore, this claim is a violent and vitriolic claim. “The military is packed with murderers” is a destructive statement that does not seek reconciliation or creation, but destruction and alienation. It implies an “us v. them” attitude which is just as violent as war.

    It seems to me that pacifism must be more than a commitment to decrying war, but a way of living your entire life non-violently (and it should be noted that violence should not be limited to physical violence).

    You make too many assumptions here and don’t back them up. I don’t disagree with you for the most part, but I find it hard to agree with you if you don’t provide arguments for your claims.

  • http://www.mutations-radicales.org Zora

    yes, refuse the patriotism is important because we are born with this culture.
    Refuse it is a good step to refuse State, borders and all form of power.
    But, to be able to live one day in peace, we have to refuse the other forms of war, like competition in capitalism, which causing more deaths and injuries than wars actually.
    For the poor and for most non-human animals, it’s war everyday.
    I note that patriotism and capitalism firms are embedded, they feed each other for the success of rich and leaders. Media and schools instill these slavery since birth.
    So the whole system is dangerous. We have to refuse “patriotism” for this existing society, being refractory, resistant, not only about war and army.
    Instead of patriotism, let’s invent a communist individualism?, inspiring by God spirit.

  • Vicki

    Wow, what a mouth full! I see your passion; however, I disagree with your position. If you look to the Bible, there were wars sanctioned by God to eradicate evil, though these came before Christ came. When Christ came, he offered another way, but the issue is not war, but the heart of man.

    All people are created in the image of God, for his good. However, the heart of man often lead him down another path. That is why we must give allegiance to Christ & his way, not our own way. We must strive to have the heart of God in every situation with a desire to do good to all people.

    Having said that, there are those whose hearts are evil & seek to dominate all humanity. When this happens, we must stand against it.

    We are not in other countries simply for imperialistic motives. We must recognize that terrorism does not stay “overseas”. It is not just “their” problem, but a global one that has & will continue to come to our shores.

    The only hope to overcome these issues is to change the ideology of the people–we are NOT the great Satan. Ideology that says to “kill the infidels” whether it is here or abroad should not be embraced as “freedom for all people”..remember the only thing needed for evil to advance is for good people to do nothing.

  • John Rich

    I believe that we are to pledge no allegiance to any human institution. When Jesus says to give to Caesar what he is due, the implication to me is that Caesar is not due anything. The oaths of loyalty which we are asked to express are means of softening the people to the terrorism and violence that our countries inflict against others. I see no redeeming value to any actions or words that lift up any one country. On the contrary, to do so only divides us and perpetuates state-sponsored violence justified by the idea that God cares about our arbitrary borders.

Previous post:

Next post: