Violence of
Absolutes: ‘Truth’, ‘God’, ‘Nonviolence’ and Other
Idols.
By Jarrod Saul McKenna
While being involved with the Anti-War
Protests at Pine Gap I was not surprised by the demonisation
of those working for peace by the media and by the police forces. To some degree you even expect that. What I was taken back with was how quickly I
found myself falling in the same trap. I was at risk of my just anger about the
issues, being projected upon those we were coming up against, namely the
police. The irony for me was over
whelming. My vision had been distorted
by my ‘rightness’ that I no longer saw the police as people rather they were
objects standing in the way of ‘what I know is best’.
“For you don’t count the dead with God on
your side.” The prophetic words of Bob Dylan slapped me
in the face as I was moved by the realisation that I was dangerously at risk of
killing off the humanity of the police in my mind. The dangers of ‘Truth’,
‘God’, or ‘rightness’ or any ‘absolutes’ has become shockingly overt to me. Like so many of our world leaders at the
moment, I had fallen victim to the ‘plankeye
problem’, trying to fix the bits of wood dust in the eye of everyone without
realising the huge bit of 2 by 4 that was blocking my own vision.
U.S. President Bush has coined his own phrase for the
problem he sees ‘out there’. Bush’s “Axis of Evil” runs through several
countries and utilizes the paradigm we are fed from the earliest age through
cartoons and books: us, and them. There
are good guys and there are bad guys the paradigm tells us. These are easily distinguishable by outward
appearance such as colours of the capes, by the sinisterness of the laughs and
by the sound track that is played in the background by Big Brother (try and
think Orwell and not reality TV). Not
much has changed between the cartoons we were weaned on as children and the
T.V. news or “info-tainment” we are now pacified and
lulled to sleep with.
This is the dominant paradigm which all of
us are trapped, not just the
The ‘us vs. them’ paradigm is found
wherever some thinks they are completely right. The lie of the ‘us vs. them’
says we are right to the exclusion of the truth as experienced those on the
othersider of a demonstration. The ‘Us
and Them’ dogma denies the truth known (however partial that knowing might be)
by those on the othersider of parliament.
‘Us and Them’ dictates the refusal to be open to the revelation given to
those in a Synagogue, a
‘Us vs. Them’ paradigm is at its essence
violent because it seeks to draw borders around and monopolise “truth”. Violence always comes from a mindset of I am
right, so absolutely right that I am justified in using force.
Our refusal to acknowledge the plank in our own eyes,
and the refusal to listen from those of us with ears to hear, I think is a sign
of our lack of trust in our own experience of truth. Thomas Merton expressed well when he said,
“The dread of being open to the ideas of others
generally comes from our hidden insecurity about our own convictions. We fear that we may be ‘converted’ – or
perverted – by a pernicious doctrine. On
the other hand, if we are mature and objective(sic.)
in our open-mindedness, we might find that viewing things from a basically different
perspective – that of our adversary – we discover our own truth in a new light
and are able to understand our own ideal more realistically.”

In seeking power over truth, we lose the ability to share
what truth we might have experienced and stands in the way of society becoming
what Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. called “the beloved
community”. Understanding implies
humility because we must ‘stand under’ truth, which also implies truth it is
bigger than us and how we might perceive it.
The refusal to listen to others, I believe, is also the refusal to
listen to the gracious Beyond communicate something bigger than either side of
argument.
I pray we are able to move beyond seeing
the world in the categories of us and them and see, to use the Quaker
expression “that which is of God in all of us” or the Hindu expression “Namaste”. A Rabbi
was once explaining to me the Jewish understanding of interconnectedness of our
existence with the earth, with all beings and with the Great Spirit of
Deliverance and our individual part in our shared responsibility. He explained that the Jewish understanding
was that because of the delicateness of our existence that our choices for
justice or injustice tip the world’s scales towards justice or injustice. This is the power our free will. We collectively choose the world in which we
live by our actions and by our lifestyle.
As a follower of the risen Rabbi Yeshua (Christi-Anarchy) I do believe God takes sides. In Jesus I see God sides with those who are
poor, marginalised and oppressed regardless of
the boxes we put them in or the labels we place on them. In Jesus I see the fulfilment of Love who
wills that the world would be one with the Most High, no boundaries be they
national, economic, racial, religious, philosophical or ideological. One Love, with one people, our earth, our
children, our future. In Jesus I see
that the universe does bend towards justice, and calls on all of us to lean the
same way and provides us with the resurrection power to do so. I hope that by us listening and answering the
call to lean towards justice through peace we could knock the world off the
axis of violence and retaliation.
*End note on Context: The article was written while reflecting
upon the events of the protests and upon the following passage that some
traditions hold as a sacred text:

“What shall we conclude then? Are we any better? Not
at all! Who we see as the ‘inside group’
and ‘outside group’ are both in identical conditions, that’s to say we all are
all unjust. As it is
written in the Scriptures: “There is no one just, not even one; there is no one
who understands, no one who seeks God.”
(Romans 3:9-11)